Triple
T5923049
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | TSX |
E131741
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | programming language syntax extension |
C13241
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: programming language syntax extension Context triple: [TSX, instanceOf, programming language syntax extension]
-
A.
programming language extension
chosen
A programming language extension is an add-on or modification that enhances an existing language with new syntax, features, or capabilities without fundamentally changing its core semantics.
-
B.
OCaml syntax extension
An OCaml syntax extension is a mechanism or tool that augments the OCaml language with additional syntactic constructs or transformations, typically processed at compile time to enable more expressive or domain-specific code.
-
C.
extension language platform
An extension language platform is a system that embeds or hosts a scripting or domain-specific language to allow users to customize, automate, and extend the functionality of an application or environment.
-
D.
programming language specification
A programming language specification is a formal document that precisely defines a language’s syntax, semantics, and behavior to ensure consistent implementation and usage across tools and platforms.
-
E.
programming language implementation
A programming language implementation is the concrete realization of a language’s specification, including its compiler or interpreter, runtime system, and associated tools that translate and execute programs written in that language.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c0085a1ed08190a7e9a8b6323fd680 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 3:18 p.m. |
Created at: March 22, 2026, 4 p.m.