Triple
T5922859
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | CommonJS module system |
E131737
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasKeywordLike |
P4548
|
FINISHED |
| Object | require |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: require | Statement: [CommonJS module system, hasKeywordLike, require]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasKeywordLike Context triple: [CommonJS module system, hasKeywordLike, require]
-
A.
hasKeyWork
Indicates that an entity possesses or is associated with a primary or central work (such as a main publication, artwork, or project) that is especially representative or important.
-
B.
hasTerm
Indicates that an entity includes, is associated with, or is defined by a specific term or condition.
-
C.
hasPattern
Indicates that one entity exhibits, follows, or is characterized by a specific recurring form, structure, or design defined by another entity.
-
D.
includesMatch
Indicates that one entity contains or encompasses a particular match or matching instance of another entity.
-
E.
hasNotableWord
chosen
Indicates that an entity is associated with a word or term that is considered notable, distinctive, or significant in some context.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c0085a1ed08190a7e9a8b6323fd680 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 3:18 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c03c9239e08190bff7ef2bd6d21ae0 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 7:01 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69c033541d108190a34d1fde2fe9dacb |
completed | March 22, 2026, 6:22 p.m. |
Created at: March 22, 2026, 4 p.m.