Triple
T5918924
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Cook County State's Attorney |
E131651
|
entity |
| Predicate | typeOfProsecutor |
P5672
|
FINISHED |
| Object | local prosecutor |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: local prosecutor | Statement: [Cook County State's Attorney, typeOfProsecutor, local prosecutor]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: typeOfProsecutor Context triple: [Cook County State's Attorney, typeOfProsecutor, local prosecutor]
-
A.
prosecutingAuthority
chosen
Indicates that an entity serves as the official body responsible for bringing and conducting legal proceedings against another party in a criminal or regulatory case.
-
B.
subjectOfProsecution
Indicates that an entity is the target or focus of a legal prosecution or criminal proceeding initiated by an authority.
-
C.
notableProsecutor
Indicates that the person served as a prosecutor in a way that is widely recognized as significant or noteworthy.
-
D.
judicialRole
Indicates that one entity holds or performs a specific official function or position within the judicial system in relation to another entity or legal matter.
-
E.
courtRole
Indicates the specific capacity or position an entity holds within a court proceeding or judicial context.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c0085a1ed08190a7e9a8b6323fd680 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 3:18 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c048fc112c8190b905bf561c9de096 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 7:54 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69c03352208c8190968efed05a9fd416 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 6:22 p.m. |
Created at: March 22, 2026, 4 p.m.