Triple
T5910398
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Latin Grammy Award for Song of the Year |
E131442
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasNomineeRole |
P66886
|
FINISHED |
| Object | songwriter |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: songwriter | Statement: [Latin Grammy Award for Song of the Year, hasNomineeRole, songwriter]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasNomineeRole Context triple: [Latin Grammy Award for Song of the Year, hasNomineeRole, songwriter]
-
A.
hasNomineeType
Indicates that an entity has a nominee belonging to a specified type or category.
-
B.
nominatedIn
Indicates that an entity has been formally put forward as a candidate for an award, position, or recognition within a specific event, context, or time period.
-
C.
nominationReceivedBy
Indicates that an entity has received a nomination from another entity or source.
-
D.
notableAwardNominationRecipient
Indicates that an entity has been formally nominated to receive a particular notable award.
-
E.
ultimatelyNominatedCandidate
Indicates that an entity is the final or eventual candidate nominated as the outcome of a selection or nomination process.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c008593a44819081a07ae0efe6c574 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 3:18 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c03ee10b308190afe38b904ae7c5f7 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 7:11 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69c0334fcf6481908e8e74105de9d49b |
completed | March 22, 2026, 6:22 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69c03edf98b881908e9dbc03d3fd6218 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 7:11 p.m. |
Created at: March 22, 2026, 3:59 p.m.