Triple
T5903687
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Requirements of Writing (Scotland) Act 1995 |
E131287
|
entity |
| Predicate | legalConceptIntroduced |
P59307
|
FINISHED |
| Object | probative and non‑probative written documents |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: probative and non‑probative written documents | Statement: [Requirements of Writing (Scotland) Act 1995, legalConceptIntroduced, probative and non‑probative written documents]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: legalConceptIntroduced Context triple: [Requirements of Writing (Scotland) Act 1995, legalConceptIntroduced, probative and non‑probative written documents]
-
A.
legalConcept
Indicates a relationship where something is classified or treated as a concept defined and governed by law or legal theory.
-
B.
relatedLegalConcept
Indicates that one legal concept is connected or associated with another through a relevant legal relationship or context.
-
C.
legalDoctrine
Indicates that one legal principle, rule, or theory is being applied, referenced, or relied upon as an authoritative basis for interpreting or deciding a legal issue.
-
D.
legalTermIn
chosen
Indicates that a particular legal term or concept is used, defined, or applicable within a specified legal document, jurisdiction, or context.
-
E.
legalDoctrineInfluenced
Indicates that one legal doctrine has shaped, informed, or contributed to the development or interpretation of another legal doctrine.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c0085864a88190a569c05ff7d65f29 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 3:18 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c03ee10b308190afe38b904ae7c5f7 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 7:11 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69c0334fcf6481908e8e74105de9d49b |
completed | March 22, 2026, 6:22 p.m. |
Created at: March 22, 2026, 3:58 p.m.