Triple

T5903431
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Theodora E131281 entity
Predicate hadPowerType P66833 FINISHED
Object de facto co-ruler with Justinian I LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: de facto co-ruler with Justinian I | Statement: [Theodora, hadPowerType, de facto co-ruler with Justinian I]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hadPowerType
Context triple: [Theodora, hadPowerType, de facto co-ruler with Justinian I]
  • A. hasPower
    Indicates that one entity possesses authority, control, or influence over another entity or over a particular domain or resource.
  • B. usesPowerType
    Indicates that one entity operates or functions by means of a specified type or source of power.
  • C. hasMotivePowerType
    Indicates that an entity (such as a vehicle or machine) operates using a specified type of motive power (e.g., electric, diesel, steam).
  • D. hasNumberOfPowers
    Indicates the quantity of distinct powers or abilities that an entity possesses.
  • E. hasTypeOfPowerRegulated
    Indicates that one entity exercises a specific kind of power or authority that is subject to regulation or control by another entity or governing framework.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69c0085864a88190a569c05ff7d65f29 completed March 22, 2026, 3:18 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69c03ee10b308190afe38b904ae7c5f7 completed March 22, 2026, 7:11 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69c0334fcf6481908e8e74105de9d49b completed March 22, 2026, 6:22 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69c03edf98b881908e9dbc03d3fd6218 completed March 22, 2026, 7:11 p.m.
Created at: March 22, 2026, 3:58 p.m.