Triple
T5902270
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Kesteven |
E131255
|
entity |
| Predicate | existedAsAdministrativeCountyFrom |
P67228
|
FINISHED |
| Object | 1889 |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 1889 | Statement: [Kesteven, existedAsAdministrativeCountyFrom, 1889]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: existedAsAdministrativeCountyFrom Context triple: [Kesteven, existedAsAdministrativeCountyFrom, 1889]
-
A.
existedAsCountyUntil
Indicates that an entity functioned with the status or designation of a county up to a specified end date or time period.
-
B.
historicCountyAbolishedAsAdministrativeUnit
Indicates that a historic county ceased to function as an official administrative unit.
-
C.
hasHistoricCountyStatusSince
Indicates that an entity has held the legal or recognized status of a historic county starting from a specified point in time.
-
D.
formerAdministrativeCountyIncludes
Indicates that a geographic area was once part of, or contained within, the boundaries of a former administrative county.
-
E.
hasModernAdministrativeCounty
Indicates that an entity is located within or associated with a specific modern administrative county as defined by current governmental boundaries.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c0085864a88190a569c05ff7d65f29 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 3:18 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c0400f1af881908d376ea4793f6dea |
completed | March 22, 2026, 7:16 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69c0334dc8248190b7394dcece362d52 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 6:22 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69c0400dbec08190b2ef73689b2c0c31 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 7:16 p.m. |
Created at: March 22, 2026, 3:58 p.m.