Triple
T5894093
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Solvency II Directive |
E131061
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | risk-based capital framework |
C11529
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: risk-based capital framework Context triple: [Solvency II Directive, instanceOf, risk-based capital framework]
-
A.
regulatory framework
chosen
A regulatory framework is a structured set of rules, guidelines, and enforcement mechanisms established by authorities to govern behaviors, processes, and standards within a specific domain.
-
B.
risk assessment standard
A risk assessment standard is a formalized set of principles, criteria, and procedures used to systematically identify, analyze, evaluate, and document risks within a specific domain or industry.
-
C.
organ of the European Systemic Risk Board
An organ of the European Systemic Risk Board is a formal institutional body within the ESRB’s governance structure that performs specific functions related to the identification, assessment, and mitigation of systemic risks to the EU financial system.
-
D.
financial reporting framework
A financial reporting framework is a structured set of principles, standards, and rules that guide how an entity measures, recognizes, presents, and discloses financial information in its financial statements.
-
E.
scaling framework
A scaling framework is a structured approach that defines the principles, processes, and tools needed to grow a system, organization, or product efficiently and sustainably as demand increases.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c00857439c819095950754176aa58a |
completed | March 22, 2026, 3:18 p.m. |
Created at: March 22, 2026, 3:58 p.m.