Triple

T589122
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Lapland War E17226 entity
Predicate memory P15970 FINISHED
Object significant event in Finnish Lapland regional history LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: significant event in Finnish Lapland regional history | Statement: [Lapland War, memory, significant event in Finnish Lapland regional history]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: memory
Context triple: [Lapland War, memory, significant event in Finnish Lapland regional history]
  • A. recall
    Indicates that an entity retrieves or brings back into awareness information, events, or items that were previously known, experienced, or stored.
  • B. memoryType
    Indicates the specific category or kind of memory associated with an entity or process.
  • C. memorizedBy
    Indicates that some content, information, or material has been learned and retained in memory by a particular entity.
  • D. memorizationPractice
    Indicates engaging in activities or exercises specifically intended to commit information to memory or strengthen recall.
  • E. save
    Indicates preserving or storing something from loss, harm, or use, often for future benefit or protection.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a49379d09c8190ac7e00b24e2810b1 completed March 1, 2026, 7:28 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a49bb775fc819085b968f8615dca59 completed March 1, 2026, 8:04 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a494cc13988190892ca10bd7ae9f09 completed March 1, 2026, 7:34 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69a4985ada988190aaea628a9b55bca4 completed March 1, 2026, 7:49 p.m.
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:33 p.m.