Triple
T5876948
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | K9A2 |
E130648
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasOperationalConcept |
P40722
|
FINISHED |
| Object | highly automated artillery platform |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: highly automated artillery platform | Statement: [K9A2, hasOperationalConcept, highly automated artillery platform]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasOperationalConcept Context triple: [K9A2, hasOperationalConcept, highly automated artillery platform]
-
A.
operationalConcept
chosen
Indicates that one entity defines, specifies, or embodies the operational concept or way of functioning for another entity.
-
B.
hasOperationalComponent
Indicates that an entity includes, uses, or depends on another entity as a functional or operational part of its overall system or process.
-
C.
hasConcept
Indicates that an entity includes, embodies, or is associated with a particular concept.
-
D.
operationalCapability
Indicates the ability or readiness of an entity to perform a specific function, task, or operation effectively under defined conditions.
-
E.
hasCriticalConcept
Indicates that one entity includes, depends on, or is defined by a key concept that is essential to understanding or functioning of another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c0085523688190bfd487479ce819e6 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 3:18 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c0432fea5881909f5c291dd8db6105 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 7:29 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69c033499ca08190bd26cee5b03f6306 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 6:22 p.m. |
Created at: March 22, 2026, 3:57 p.m.