Triple
T5876720
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Geneva wine region |
E130642
|
entity |
| Predicate | grapeColorDistribution |
P67384
|
FINISHED |
| Object | significant share of white varieties |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: significant share of white varieties | Statement: [Geneva wine region, grapeColorDistribution, significant share of white varieties]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: grapeColorDistribution Context triple: [Geneva wine region, grapeColorDistribution, significant share of white varieties]
-
A.
grapeColorProduced
Indicates the color that is produced by or characteristic of a given grape.
-
B.
grapeColorForReds
Indicates that the predicate specifies the typical color of grapes used to produce red wines.
-
C.
wineColor
Indicates the color attribute or hue associated with a given wine.
-
D.
grapeVarietyAllowed
Indicates that a specific grape variety is permitted or authorized for use in a given context, such as a wine, region, or product specification.
-
E.
grapeSource
Indicates that one entity is the origin or provider of grapes used by another entity.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c0085523688190bfd487479ce819e6 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 3:18 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c0432fea5881909f5c291dd8db6105 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 7:29 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69c033499ca08190bd26cee5b03f6306 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 6:22 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69c0432f06fc8190bc047d52ffc30d59 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 7:29 p.m. |
Created at: March 22, 2026, 3:57 p.m.