Triple
T585089
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Rensselaer County |
E15139
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasUrbanAreas |
P11388
|
FINISHED |
| Object | yes |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: yes | Statement: [Rensselaer County, hasUrbanAreas, yes]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasUrbanAreas Context triple: [Rensselaer County, hasUrbanAreas, yes]
-
A.
containsUrbanArea
chosen
Indicates that a geographic region fully or partially encompasses an urbanized area within its boundaries.
-
B.
hasUrbanFeature
Indicates that a place or area possesses a specific urban element or infrastructure feature (such as roads, parks, or buildings) as part of its built environment.
-
C.
hasUrbanFunction
Indicates that an entity serves a specific role or purpose within an urban context, such as providing services, infrastructure, or activities typical of a city environment.
-
D.
urbanAreaType
Indicates the classification of an area based on its urban characteristics or development type (e.g., city, town, suburb, metropolitan region).
-
E.
withinUrbanArea
Indicates that one entity is located inside the spatial boundaries of an urban area associated with another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a4935783b8819082b77726ec10cc42 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 7:28 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a49b9874c88190bd1e08d4689ea124 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 8:03 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a494c9315c8190a773e8e00737d8a0 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 7:34 p.m. |
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:33 p.m.