Triple
T5840522
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Viking textiles |
E129579
|
entity |
| Predicate | preservationContext |
P40904
|
FINISHED |
| Object | waterlogged sites |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: waterlogged sites | Statement: [Viking textiles, preservationContext, waterlogged sites]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: preservationContext Context triple: [Viking textiles, preservationContext, waterlogged sites]
-
A.
preservationPurpose
Indicates that something exists, is created, or is maintained with the specific aim of preserving or safeguarding another entity or resource.
-
B.
preservationFocus
Indicates that the primary concern or emphasis is on maintaining, protecting, or conserving something in its existing or intended state.
-
C.
preservationType
chosen
Indicates the method or process by which something is preserved or kept from deterioration.
-
D.
preservedAt
Indicates that something is kept, maintained, or conserved in a particular place or context.
-
E.
stateOfPreservation
Indicates the condition or degree to which something has been maintained, conserved, or kept intact over time.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c0084bd31c8190a796bb6284845e83 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 3:18 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c03c9239e08190bff7ef2bd6d21ae0 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 7:01 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69c0334412388190bc594794ec5754f9 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 6:21 p.m. |
Created at: March 22, 2026, 3:54 p.m.