Triple

T5839068
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject court of cassation E129546 entity
Predicate mayBeOrganizedBy P67489 FINISHED
Object chambers LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: chambers | Statement: [court of cassation, mayBeOrganizedBy, chambers]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: mayBeOrganizedBy
Context triple: [court of cassation, mayBeOrganizedBy, chambers]
  • A. oftenOrganizedBy
    Indicates that an event, activity, or process is frequently arranged, coordinated, or hosted by a particular agent or entity.
  • B. notOrganizedBy
    Indicates that an event, activity, or entity is explicitly not arranged, coordinated, or managed by a specified agent or organization.
  • C. organisedFor
    Indicates that something has been arranged, structured, or coordinated specifically to serve, support, or benefit a particular entity or purpose.
  • D. organizedAt
    Indicates that an event or activity was arranged, planned, or hosted at a specific location or venue.
  • E. formerlyOrganisedBy
    Indicates that an event or activity was organized by a particular entity in the past, but is no longer organized by that entity.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69c0084af79c81908af128ccc29983d0 completed March 22, 2026, 3:18 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69c044ab0a048190b84be40fb13c0f50 completed March 22, 2026, 7:36 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69c03341e5888190a5f219b6f92cb161 completed March 22, 2026, 6:21 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69c044a9c4f0819081b8c196932883f6 completed March 22, 2026, 7:36 p.m.
Created at: March 22, 2026, 3:54 p.m.