Triple
T5818244
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | The Harvard Advocate |
E129038
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasSubmissionPolicy |
P67136
|
FINISHED |
| Object | accepts submissions |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: accepts submissions | Statement: [The Harvard Advocate, hasSubmissionPolicy, accepts submissions]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasSubmissionPolicy Context triple: [The Harvard Advocate, hasSubmissionPolicy, accepts submissions]
-
A.
hasPolicySupport
Indicates that one entity provides endorsement, backing, or approval for a specific policy associated with another entity.
-
B.
hasPeerReviewPolicy
Indicates that an entity maintains or is governed by a specific policy outlining how peer review is conducted.
-
C.
hasSignaturePolicy
Indicates that an entity is governed by a specific policy defining rules or requirements for creating, validating, or using signatures.
-
D.
supportsPolicy
Indicates that one entity endorses, backs, or is in favor of a particular policy or set of policies.
-
E.
hasNotablePolicy
Indicates that an entity possesses a policy that is distinguished, significant, or otherwise noteworthy in its context.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c0084869e881908d7859492183ca7b |
completed | March 22, 2026, 3:18 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c0400f1af881908d376ea4793f6dea |
completed | March 22, 2026, 7:16 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69c0333fdd7081908d829265caa2ac11 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 6:21 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69c0400dbec08190b2ef73689b2c0c31 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 7:16 p.m. |
Created at: March 22, 2026, 3:53 p.m.