Triple
T5816088
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Tola |
E128988
|
entity |
| Predicate | traditionListsAsJudge |
P67121
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Jewish tradition |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Jewish tradition | Statement: [Tola, traditionListsAsJudge, Jewish tradition]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: traditionListsAsJudge Context triple: [Tola, traditionListsAsJudge, Jewish tradition]
-
A.
judgesMayBe
Indicates that certain individuals can serve in the role of judges under specified conditions or classifications.
-
B.
judgesSelectedWithParticipationOf
Indicates that the selection of judges occurred with the involvement or participation of a specified party or entity.
-
C.
judgedBy
Indicates that one entity evaluates, assesses, or forms an opinion about another entity, often in an official or critical capacity.
-
D.
statusInJudges
Indicates that an entity holds a particular role, position, or standing within a group or body of judges.
-
E.
roleInJudges
Indicates that an entity holds or held a specific role, position, or function within a judicial body or among a group of judges.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c0084869e881908d7859492183ca7b |
completed | March 22, 2026, 3:18 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c0400f1af881908d376ea4793f6dea |
completed | March 22, 2026, 7:16 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69c0333fdd7081908d829265caa2ac11 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 6:21 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69c0400dbec08190b2ef73689b2c0c31 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 7:16 p.m. |
Created at: March 22, 2026, 3:53 p.m.