Triple
T5796404
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Sacred and Profane Love |
E128517
|
entity |
| Predicate | artHistoricalDebate |
P66577
|
FINISHED |
| Object | interpretation of allegory |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: interpretation of allegory | Statement: [Sacred and Profane Love, artHistoricalDebate, interpretation of allegory]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: artHistoricalDebate Context triple: [Sacred and Profane Love, artHistoricalDebate, interpretation of allegory]
-
A.
artHistoricalInterpretation
Indicates an interpretive relationship where an artwork is analyzed or explained through art-historical methods, theories, or contextual understanding.
-
B.
heritageDebate
Indicates a discussion or dispute concerning the preservation, interpretation, or value of cultural or historical heritage.
-
C.
inArtSince
Indicates that an entity has been involved or active in the field of art starting from a specified time.
-
D.
historicityDebate
Indicates a debate or scholarly dispute over whether an event, figure, or narrative is historically factual or actually occurred.
-
E.
hasArtHistoricalSignificance
Indicates that something holds notable importance or influence within the context of art history.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c00845ca68819081a2ce3ecca577f7 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 3:18 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c02b1304588190b59a18fb7b70a60f |
completed | March 22, 2026, 5:46 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69c021d477008190946113f9859eeb90 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 5:07 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69c02b10def8819080859bc6505405ed |
completed | March 22, 2026, 5:46 p.m. |
Created at: March 22, 2026, 3:51 p.m.