Triple
T5774776
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Hale crater |
E127412
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasComplexGeology |
P66363
|
FINISHED |
| Object | true |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [Hale crater, hasComplexGeology, true]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasComplexGeology Context triple: [Hale crater, hasComplexGeology, true]
-
A.
hasGeologicalSignificance
Indicates that something possesses notable importance or relevance within a geological context, such as Earth’s structure, history, or processes.
-
B.
hasGeologicalEvidenceOf
Indicates that there is geological data or features supporting the existence, occurrence, or impact of a specified phenomenon or event.
-
C.
surfaceGeologyKnown
Indicates that the composition or characteristics of an entity’s surface geology have been determined or are known.
-
D.
geologyIncludes
Indicates that one geological entity contains, encompasses, or has as a component another geological entity.
-
E.
geologicalStatus
Indicates the current geological condition or classification of an entity, such as its formation state, activity level, or structural status within the Earth’s crust.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c008361fa88190aefa4dc41b051e7f |
completed | March 22, 2026, 3:18 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c02acb12c081908e4beee4a957f9f9 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 5:45 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69c021d0c6088190ba670ddcdbf5ca3e |
completed | March 22, 2026, 5:07 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69c02ac9603481909e3fa295d7904a15 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 5:45 p.m. |
Created at: March 22, 2026, 3:50 p.m.