Triple

T5770518

Position	Surface form	Disambiguated ID	Type / Status
Subject	United States v. Leon	`E127319`	entity
Predicate	subsequentCitationBy	`P15322`	FINISHED
Object	Illinois v. Krull Illinois v. Krull is a 1987 U.S. Supreme Court decision that extended the good-faith exception to the exclusionary rule to evidence obtained by police relying on a statute later found unconstitutional.	`E545161`	NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (4 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini

Instruction

Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).

Input

Phrase: Illinois v. Krull | Statement: [United States v. Leon, subsequentCitationBy, Illinois v. Krull]

NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07

Target entity: Illinois v. Krull
Context triple: [United States v. Leon, subsequentCitationBy, Illinois v. Krull]

A. Illinois v. Wardlow
Illinois v. Wardlow is a 2000 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held an individual's unprovoked flight in a high-crime area can contribute to reasonable suspicion justifying a stop under the Fourth Amendment.
B. Moore v. Illinois
Moore v. Illinois is a United States Supreme Court decision addressing constitutional criminal procedure issues, particularly concerning the rights of defendants in state prosecutions.
C. Scott v. Illinois
Scott v. Illinois is a 1979 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held the Sixth Amendment right to appointed counsel applies only when a defendant is actually sentenced to imprisonment, thereby limiting the broader protections suggested in Argersinger v. Hamlin.
D. Escobedo v. Illinois
Escobedo v. Illinois is a landmark 1964 U.S. Supreme Court case that expanded the Sixth Amendment right to counsel during police interrogations and helped lay the groundwork for the later Miranda warnings.
E. Munn v. Illinois
Munn v. Illinois is an 1877 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld state regulation of private industries affecting the public interest, marking a key moment in the development of government regulatory power.
F. None of above. chosen
G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

NEDg Description generation gpt-5.1

Instruction

Generate a one-sentence description of the target entity. 
You are given a context triple in the form (subject, predicate, object), where the object is the target entity. 
# Instructions
Use the triple to infer relevant information about the entity. Describe the entity based on what is most defining, well-known. 
Avoid repeating the information from the triple, unless really essential.
# Response Format
Return only the sentence: "Description: [one-sentence description of the target entity]"

Input

Entity: Illinois v. Krull
Triple: [United States v. Leon, subsequentCitationBy, Illinois v. Krull]

Generated description

Illinois v. Krull is a 1987 U.S. Supreme Court decision that extended the good-faith exception to the exclusionary rule to evidence obtained by police relying on a statute later found unconstitutional.

NED2 Entity disambiguation (via description) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07

Target entity: Illinois v. Krull
Target entity description: Illinois v. Krull is a 1987 U.S. Supreme Court decision that extended the good-faith exception to the exclusionary rule to evidence obtained by police relying on a statute later found unconstitutional.

A. Illinois v. Wardlow
Illinois v. Wardlow is a 2000 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held an individual's unprovoked flight in a high-crime area can contribute to reasonable suspicion justifying a stop under the Fourth Amendment.
B. Moore v. Illinois
Moore v. Illinois is a United States Supreme Court decision addressing constitutional criminal procedure issues, particularly concerning the rights of defendants in state prosecutions.
C. Scott v. Illinois
Scott v. Illinois is a 1979 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held the Sixth Amendment right to appointed counsel applies only when a defendant is actually sentenced to imprisonment, thereby limiting the broader protections suggested in Argersinger v. Hamlin.
D. Escobedo v. Illinois
Escobedo v. Illinois is a landmark 1964 U.S. Supreme Court case that expanded the Sixth Amendment right to counsel during police interrogations and helped lay the groundwork for the later Miranda warnings.
E. Munn v. Illinois
Munn v. Illinois is an 1877 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld state regulation of private industries affecting the public interest, marking a key moment in the development of government regulatory power.
F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (5 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step	Stage	Batch ID	Status	When
creating	Elicitation	`batch_69c00834f6308190851b0abeddd8ed7e`	completed	March 22, 2026, 3:18 p.m.
NER	Named-entity recognition	`batch_69c029aa877c8190bf6a944f18cca3b8`	completed	March 22, 2026, 5:40 p.m.
NED1	Entity disambiguation (via context triple)	`batch_69c07e648aa881908411a00d48998ecc`	completed	March 22, 2026, 11:42 p.m.
NEDg	Description generation	`batch_69c089433c488190b617d0106ba5eba9`	completed	March 23, 2026, 12:28 a.m.
NED2	Entity disambiguation (via description)	`batch_69c0899063ec8190bb24d9f0d317ffa6`	completed	March 23, 2026, 12:30 a.m.

Created at: March 22, 2026, 3:50 p.m.