Triple
T5769543
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Continuing Disability Reviews |
E127292
|
entity |
| Predicate | appealLevelsInclude |
P15240
|
FINISHED |
| Object | reconsideration |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: reconsideration | Statement: [Continuing Disability Reviews, appealLevelsInclude, reconsideration]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: appealLevelsInclude Context triple: [Continuing Disability Reviews, appealLevelsInclude, reconsideration]
-
A.
levelOfAppeal
Indicates the degree or intensity to which something is attractive, interesting, or desirable to someone or something.
-
B.
appealsFor
Indicates that one entity formally requests support, intervention, or a favorable decision from another entity.
-
C.
hasAppealsTo
Indicates that one entity formally challenges or seeks review of a decision, judgment, or outcome through another entity or process.
-
D.
typeOfAppeals
chosen
Indicates the specific category or kind of appeals associated with or applied to a given case, decision, or legal action.
-
E.
appealsFrom
Indicates that a decision, judgment, or ruling is being challenged and taken to a higher authority or court for review.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c00834f6308190851b0abeddd8ed7e |
completed | March 22, 2026, 3:18 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c02acb12c081908e4beee4a957f9f9 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 5:45 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69c021ce8d3c81909b332cb1c33a61ad |
completed | March 22, 2026, 5:07 p.m. |
Created at: March 22, 2026, 3:50 p.m.