Triple
T5769540
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Continuing Disability Reviews |
E127292
|
entity |
| Predicate | nonCooperationMayLeadTo |
P66314
|
FINISHED |
| Object | suspension of benefits |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: suspension of benefits | Statement: [Continuing Disability Reviews, nonCooperationMayLeadTo, suspension of benefits]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: nonCooperationMayLeadTo Context triple: [Continuing Disability Reviews, nonCooperationMayLeadTo, suspension of benefits]
-
A.
nonGovernmental
Indicates that an entity, action, or relationship is not associated with, controlled by, or part of a government or governmental body.
-
B.
doesNotAbolish
Indicates that one entity, action, or law does not eliminate, revoke, or put an end to another.
-
C.
notEnforcedBy
Indicates that a rule, policy, or obligation is not upheld, imposed, or carried out by the referenced enforcing entity.
-
D.
meansOfStruggle
Indicates the method, tactic, or form of action used by an entity in carrying out a struggle or conflict.
-
E.
nonConstructive
Indicates that the relationship or action does not provide a direct, explicit method or example to realize or build the object, outcome, or proof it asserts exists.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c00834f6308190851b0abeddd8ed7e |
completed | March 22, 2026, 3:18 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c02acb12c081908e4beee4a957f9f9 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 5:45 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69c021ce8d3c81909b332cb1c33a61ad |
completed | March 22, 2026, 5:07 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69c02ac9603481909e3fa295d7904a15 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 5:45 p.m. |
Created at: March 22, 2026, 3:50 p.m.