Triple
T5768408
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Safari Extensions |
E127267
|
entity |
| Predicate | canBeManagedIn |
P29724
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Safari settings |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Safari settings | Statement: [Safari Extensions, canBeManagedIn, Safari settings]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: canBeManagedIn Context triple: [Safari Extensions, canBeManagedIn, Safari settings]
-
A.
isManagedFor
Indicates that one entity is administered, overseen, or controlled on behalf of another entity or purpose.
-
B.
managedIn
chosen
Indicates that one entity is administered, operated, or overseen within the scope, control, or jurisdiction of another entity.
-
C.
hasManagement
Indicates that one entity exercises managerial authority or oversight over another entity.
-
D.
canBe
Indicates that one entity has the potential, permission, or capability to become, perform as, or be classified as another entity.
-
E.
notManagedBy
Indicates that an entity is explicitly not under the control, supervision, or administrative responsibility of the specified manager or managing entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c00834f6308190851b0abeddd8ed7e |
completed | March 22, 2026, 3:18 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c02acb12c081908e4beee4a957f9f9 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 5:45 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69c021ce8d3c81909b332cb1c33a61ad |
completed | March 22, 2026, 5:07 p.m. |
Created at: March 22, 2026, 3:49 p.m.