Triple
T5768254
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | SDES |
E127264
|
entity |
| Predicate | securityLimitation |
P66301
|
FINISHED |
| Object | keys exposed to signaling path |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: keys exposed to signaling path | Statement: [SDES, securityLimitation, keys exposed to signaling path]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: securityLimitation Context triple: [SDES, securityLimitation, keys exposed to signaling path]
-
A.
securityGuarantee
Indicates a commitment by one party to protect or defend another party against specified threats or risks.
-
B.
securityAssumption
Indicates that a particular condition, behavior, or property is presumed to hold true for security purposes within a system or protocol.
-
C.
securityAspect
Indicates a relationship where something pertains to, represents, or characterizes a particular aspect or dimension of security.
-
D.
securityFeature
Indicates that an entity provides, embodies, or is associated with a mechanism or property intended to enhance safety, protection, or defense against threats or vulnerabilities.
-
E.
securityMechanism
Indicates a relationship where one entity serves as a means or method to protect another entity from threats, vulnerabilities, or unauthorized actions.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c00834f6308190851b0abeddd8ed7e |
completed | March 22, 2026, 3:18 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c02acb12c081908e4beee4a957f9f9 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 5:45 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69c021ce8d3c81909b332cb1c33a61ad |
completed | March 22, 2026, 5:07 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69c02ac9603481909e3fa295d7904a15 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 5:45 p.m. |
Created at: March 22, 2026, 3:49 p.m.