Triple
T5767798
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | XML technology stack |
E127255
|
entity |
| Predicate | includesTooling |
P66291
|
FINISHED |
| Object | XML parsers |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: XML parsers | Statement: [XML technology stack, includesTooling, XML parsers]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: includesTooling Context triple: [XML technology stack, includesTooling, XML parsers]
-
A.
isToolIn
Indicates that a tool is located within or contained inside a specified space, container, or context.
-
B.
usesToolType
Indicates that an entity performs an action or fulfills a role by employing a specific type or category of tool.
-
C.
usedByTool
Indicates that a particular tool is employed or operated by a specified agent or entity.
-
D.
toolchain
Indicates a relationship where one entity is used as a coordinated set of tools or processes to build, compile, or transform another entity (typically software or code).
-
E.
relatedTool
Indicates that one tool has a meaningful association or connection with another tool, such as being complementary, compatible, or commonly used together.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c00834f6308190851b0abeddd8ed7e |
completed | March 22, 2026, 3:18 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c02acb12c081908e4beee4a957f9f9 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 5:45 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69c021ce8d3c81909b332cb1c33a61ad |
completed | March 22, 2026, 5:07 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69c02ac9603481909e3fa295d7904a15 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 5:45 p.m. |
Created at: March 22, 2026, 3:49 p.m.