Triple

T5766888
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject K-short E127236 entity
Predicate hasCPApproximateEigenvalue P66278 FINISHED
Object +1 LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: +1 | Statement: [K-short, hasCPApproximateEigenvalue, +1]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasCPApproximateEigenvalue
Context triple: [K-short, hasCPApproximateEigenvalue, +1]
  • A. hasApproximateValue
    Indicates that one entity’s value is close to, but not exactly equal to, the value of another entity within an acceptable margin of error.
  • B. approximates
    Indicates that one entity is close to, but not exactly equal to, the value, form, or behavior of another entity.
  • C. hasApproximateShape
    Indicates that one entity has a shape that is similar to, but not exactly the same as, the shape of another entity.
  • D. hasApproximateValueUncertainty
    Indicates that the value of something is known only approximately and carries an associated degree or range of uncertainty.
  • E. holdsApproximatelyFor
    Indicates that a condition, relation, or value is valid only to an approximate degree or within a tolerance, rather than holding exactly.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69c00834f6308190851b0abeddd8ed7e completed March 22, 2026, 3:18 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69c02acb12c081908e4beee4a957f9f9 completed March 22, 2026, 5:45 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69c021ce8d3c81909b332cb1c33a61ad completed March 22, 2026, 5:07 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69c02ac9603481909e3fa295d7904a15 completed March 22, 2026, 5:45 p.m.
Created at: March 22, 2026, 3:49 p.m.