Triple
T5766585
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | CNL |
E127229
|
entity |
| Predicate | confederationScope |
P66265
|
FINISHED |
| Object | member associations of CONCACAF |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: member associations of CONCACAF | Statement: [CNL, confederationScope, member associations of CONCACAF]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: confederationScope Context triple: [CNL, confederationScope, member associations of CONCACAF]
-
A.
allianceScope
Indicates the extent or boundaries of cooperation and mutual obligations defined within an alliance relationship.
-
B.
confederationType
Indicates the specific kind or category of confederative relationship that exists between the associated entities.
-
C.
confederationLevel
Indicates the degree or extent to which entities are joined together in a confederation-type relationship, typically sharing power while retaining significant autonomy.
-
D.
confederation
Indicates a formal union or alliance between multiple entities that retain their individual autonomy while cooperating under a shared framework or agreement.
-
E.
confederation2
Indicates a formal alliance or union in which multiple entities join together under a shared framework while retaining their individual autonomy.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c00834f6308190851b0abeddd8ed7e |
completed | March 22, 2026, 3:18 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c02acb12c081908e4beee4a957f9f9 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 5:45 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69c021ce8d3c81909b332cb1c33a61ad |
completed | March 22, 2026, 5:07 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69c02ac9603481909e3fa295d7904a15 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 5:45 p.m. |
Created at: March 22, 2026, 3:49 p.m.