Triple
T575979
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | HTML5 |
E13761
|
entity |
| Predicate | introducesElement |
P3097
|
FINISHED |
| Object | article |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: article | Statement: [HTML5, introducesElement, article]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: introducesElement Context triple: [HTML5, introducesElement, article]
-
A.
introduced
Indicates that one entity caused another entity to become known, presented, or brought into use for the first time to a person, group, or context.
-
B.
usesElement
chosen
Indicates that one entity makes use of, incorporates, or depends on a specified element in its structure, function, or behavior.
-
C.
introducedEvent
Indicates that an entity is responsible for bringing an event into existence or initiating it for the first time.
-
D.
introducedConcept
Indicates that one entity is responsible for presenting, defining, or bringing a new concept into use or awareness for another entity or context.
-
E.
canIntroduce
Indicates that one entity has the ability or permission to introduce another entity to a third party or context.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a4933fa4d88190a7949cc83c08c5c1 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 7:27 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a49b67395c8190a8046ff7debe9d1f |
completed | March 1, 2026, 8:02 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a494c692288190b88f30299516b5ba |
completed | March 1, 2026, 7:34 p.m. |
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:33 p.m.