Triple

T5754996
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject local government of Chile E126943 entity
Predicate previousRegionalExecutive P12937 FINISHED
Object intendant of Chile LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: intendant of Chile | Statement: [local government of Chile, previousRegionalExecutive, intendant of Chile]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: previousRegionalExecutive
Context triple: [local government of Chile, previousRegionalExecutive, intendant of Chile]
  • A. previousAdministrator chosen
    Indicates that one entity formerly held an administrative role or position over another entity before the current administrator.
  • B. formerDirector
    Indicates that one entity previously held the position of director of the other entity but no longer does.
  • C. previousCoCEOWith
    Indicates that two entities previously served together as co-chief executive officers of the same organization.
  • D. officePreviouslyHeldBy
    Indicates that a particular office or position was formerly occupied by a specified person or entity.
  • E. hasRegionalRole
    Indicates that an entity holds a specific role, function, or responsibility within a defined geographic region.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69c00832aedc81909899801b141fa3b4 completed March 22, 2026, 3:18 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69c02904dcf481909e4340a64ee1034e completed March 22, 2026, 5:38 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69c021cc68648190bb86d049ebe80f12 completed March 22, 2026, 5:07 p.m.
Created at: March 22, 2026, 3:49 p.m.