Triple
T5752755
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Greenberg |
E126889
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasReviewReception |
P66549
|
FINISHED |
| Object | generally positive critical reviews |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: generally positive critical reviews | Statement: [Greenberg, hasReviewReception, generally positive critical reviews]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasReviewReception Context triple: [Greenberg, hasReviewReception, generally positive critical reviews]
-
A.
hasRecension
Indicates that one textual version or edition is a revised or alternative form of another text.
-
B.
hasReviewPeriod
Indicates that an entity is associated with a specific time span during which it is subject to review or evaluation.
-
C.
hasReception
Indicates that an entity hosts, includes, or is associated with a reception event (such as a formal gathering or welcoming function).
-
D.
areReviewedEvery
Indicates that one entity conducts reviews of another entity at every specified time interval or on every relevant occasion.
-
E.
reviewedBy
Indicates that an item, work, or action has been examined and evaluated by a specific agent or reviewer.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c00832aedc81909899801b141fa3b4 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 3:18 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c02b52663c8190ab44258468d4296d |
completed | March 22, 2026, 5:48 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69c021ca61688190875bd6107161c284 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 5:07 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69c02b4ea03c81908c3d799462de20c4 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 5:47 p.m. |
Created at: March 22, 2026, 3:48 p.m.