Triple
T5738413
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala |
E126554
|
entity |
| Predicate | overruledPrecedent |
P2251
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Golaknath v. State of Punjab |
E547312
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Golaknath v. State of Punjab | Statement: [Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala, overruledPrecedent, Golaknath v. State of Punjab]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Golaknath v. State of Punjab Context triple: [Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala, overruledPrecedent, Golaknath v. State of Punjab]
-
A.
I.C. Golaknath v. State of Punjab
chosen
I.C. Golaknath v. State of Punjab is a landmark 1967 Indian Supreme Court case that held Parliament could not amend fundamental rights under the Constitution, sharply limiting its amending power until this view was later modified.
-
B.
Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala
Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala is a landmark 1973 Supreme Court of India judgment that established the basic structure doctrine, limiting Parliament’s power to amend the Constitution.
-
C.
S. R. Bommai v. Union of India
S. R. Bommai v. Union of India is a landmark 1994 Supreme Court of India judgment that curtailed the arbitrary use of President’s Rule and strengthened federalism by applying the basic structure doctrine to center-state relations.
-
D.
Minerva Mills Ltd. v. Union of India
Minerva Mills Ltd. v. Union of India is a landmark 1980 judgment of the Supreme Court of India that reaffirmed and strengthened the basic structure doctrine by limiting Parliament’s power to amend the Constitution.
-
E.
Waman Rao v. Union of India
Waman Rao v. Union of India is a landmark 1981 Supreme Court of India judgment that reaffirmed and clarified the basic structure doctrine by upholding its applicability to constitutional amendments made after the Kesavananda Bharati decision.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c0083082288190b7478cead6b5430a |
completed | March 22, 2026, 3:18 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c0255c8c308190821f968ec41c5078 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 5:22 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69c0b0ba6ef48190b2219879222ca10c |
completed | March 23, 2026, 3:17 a.m. |
Created at: March 22, 2026, 3:47 p.m.