Triple
T5735573
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | The Shag |
E126493
|
entity |
| Predicate | partnerRole |
P45538
|
FINISHED |
| Object | leader |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: leader | Statement: [The Shag, partnerRole, leader]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: partnerRole Context triple: [The Shag, partnerRole, leader]
-
A.
partnerInOrganizationWith
Indicates that two entities are associated as partners within the same organization or organizational context.
-
B.
partnerInRuleWith
Indicates that two or more entities jointly participate as partners in establishing, enforcing, or being governed by the same rule or regulatory framework.
-
C.
collaboratorRole
chosen
Indicates the specific function, position, or capacity in which one collaborator participates in a shared activity or project with another.
-
D.
partnerInMission
Indicates that two or more entities collaborate as partners in carrying out the same mission or operation.
-
E.
partnerInMyth
Indicates a mythological relationship in which two entities are partners or companions within the same myth or mythic narrative.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c0083082288190b7478cead6b5430a |
completed | March 22, 2026, 3:18 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c025596b5c81909b5626773c91cecb |
completed | March 22, 2026, 5:22 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69c021c8195481909419808b002628aa |
completed | March 22, 2026, 5:07 p.m. |
Created at: March 22, 2026, 3:47 p.m.