Triple
T5732662
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | IEEE Bylaws |
E126419
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasLegalStatusAs |
P2250
|
FINISHED |
| Object | internal governing rules of IEEE |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: internal governing rules of IEEE | Statement: [IEEE Bylaws, hasLegalStatusAs, internal governing rules of IEEE]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasLegalStatusAs Context triple: [IEEE Bylaws, hasLegalStatusAs, internal governing rules of IEEE]
-
A.
hasLegalStatus
chosen
Indicates that an entity possesses a particular legal classification, recognition, or standing under law.
-
B.
hasSpecialLegalStatus
Indicates that an entity possesses a distinct, formally recognized legal standing or set of rights and obligations that differs from the standard legal status of comparable entities.
-
C.
hasLegalAuthorityFrom
Indicates that one entity possesses formal legal power, rights, or authorization that originates from or is granted by another entity.
-
D.
hasLegalRank
Indicates that an entity holds a specific legal status, classification, or rank within a formal legal or regulatory system.
-
E.
hasLegalForceIn
Indicates that something (such as a law, regulation, or agreement) is legally valid, binding, and enforceable within a specified jurisdiction or context.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c0083082288190b7478cead6b5430a |
completed | March 22, 2026, 3:18 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c029014588819094a2a0f6f9b66bab |
completed | March 22, 2026, 5:38 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69c021c6488881909bed4a4534d57f70 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 5:07 p.m. |
Created at: March 22, 2026, 3:47 p.m.