Triple
T5731576
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Jeffrey Skilling |
E126394
|
entity |
| Predicate | USSupremeCourtDecision |
P1628
|
FINISHED |
| Object | 2010 Skilling v. United States decision narrowing honest-services fraud statute |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 2010 Skilling v. United States decision narrowing honest-services fraud statute | Statement: [Jeffrey Skilling, USSupremeCourtDecision, 2010 Skilling v. United States decision narrowing honest-services fraud statute]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: USSupremeCourtDecision Context triple: [Jeffrey Skilling, USSupremeCourtDecision, 2010 Skilling v. United States decision narrowing honest-services fraud statute]
-
A.
chiefJusticeAtDecision
Indicates that the specified person was serving as the chief justice at the time a particular decision was made.
-
B.
notableSupremeCourtCase
chosen
Indicates that a legal case is recognized as a significant or influential decision by the Supreme Court.
-
C.
majorityJustices
Indicates that the referenced justices constitute more than half of the members of the relevant court or judicial panel in a given decision or context.
-
D.
supremeCourtService
Indicates that an entity serves or has served as a member (e.g., justice or judge) on a supreme court.
-
E.
SupremeCourtEffect
Indicates that an action, decision, or condition has an effect that is determined by, derived from, or constrained by the rulings or authority of a supreme court.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c0083082288190b7478cead6b5430a |
completed | March 22, 2026, 3:18 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c029014588819094a2a0f6f9b66bab |
completed | March 22, 2026, 5:38 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69c021c6488881909bed4a4534d57f70 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 5:07 p.m. |
Created at: March 22, 2026, 3:47 p.m.