Triple

T5721704
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Eisenstadt v. Baird E126159 entity
Predicate subsequentCitationIn P13319 FINISHED
Object Carey v. Population Services International E395565 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Carey v. Population Services International | Statement: [Eisenstadt v. Baird, subsequentCitationIn, Carey v. Population Services International]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Carey v. Population Services International
Context triple: [Eisenstadt v. Baird, subsequentCitationIn, Carey v. Population Services International]
  • A. Carey v. Population Services International chosen
    Carey v. Population Services International is a 1977 U.S. Supreme Court case that extended constitutional protections for access to contraceptives, particularly for minors, under the right to privacy.
  • B. Planned Parenthood v. Abbott
    Planned Parenthood v. Abbott is a 2013 federal court case in which abortion providers challenged Texas restrictions that imposed stringent requirements on abortion clinics and physicians, arguing they placed an undue burden on women seeking abortions.
  • C. Planned Parenthood v. Casey
    Planned Parenthood v. Casey is a landmark 1992 U.S. Supreme Court decision that reaffirmed the constitutional right to abortion while allowing greater state regulation under the “undue burden” standard.
  • D. Stenberg v. Carhart
    Stenberg v. Carhart is a 2000 U.S. Supreme Court decision that struck down a Nebraska law banning so-called “partial-birth abortion” as unconstitutional for lacking a health exception for the mother and imposing an undue burden on abortion access.
  • E. Center for Reproductive Rights
    The Center for Reproductive Rights is an international legal advocacy organization that uses constitutional and human rights law to advance and defend reproductive rights worldwide.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69c0082e3d548190950169847b43043b completed March 22, 2026, 3:18 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69c024e5697081908096b42b3d71c9a7 completed March 22, 2026, 5:20 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69c05a80aefc8190b6ea35ab405ea502 completed March 22, 2026, 9:09 p.m.
Created at: March 22, 2026, 3:46 p.m.