Triple
T5712696
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Trollz |
E125945
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasRemixOrAlternateVersion |
P9639
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Trollz alternate versions and edits |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Trollz alternate versions and edits | Statement: [Trollz, hasRemixOrAlternateVersion, Trollz alternate versions and edits]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasRemixOrAlternateVersion Context triple: [Trollz, hasRemixOrAlternateVersion, Trollz alternate versions and edits]
-
A.
hasRemix
chosen
Indicates that one creative work is a remix version derived from or based on another work.
-
B.
hasCoverVersions
Indicates that a musical work has one or more recorded versions performed or produced by artists other than the original creator.
-
C.
hasMultipleVersions
Indicates that an entity exists in more than one distinct version or revision.
-
D.
hasDifferentEditions
Indicates that an entity exists in multiple distinct versions or editions that differ in some characteristics.
-
E.
hasLyricalVariant
Indicates that one item has an alternative version that differs in its lyrics while remaining related to the original.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c0082d6fe48190b777fb383769e5c8 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 3:18 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c029014588819094a2a0f6f9b66bab |
completed | March 22, 2026, 5:38 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69c021c47f4c81909e6849c3be3e951c |
completed | March 22, 2026, 5:07 p.m. |
Created at: March 22, 2026, 3:46 p.m.