Triple
T5703541
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Grand Veneur de France |
E125726
|
entity |
| Predicate | rightGrantedBy |
P2246
|
FINISHED |
| Object | royal appointment |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: royal appointment | Statement: [Grand Veneur de France, rightGrantedBy, royal appointment]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: rightGrantedBy Context triple: [Grand Veneur de France, rightGrantedBy, royal appointment]
-
A.
grantedBy
chosen
Indicates that a right, permission, or benefit is conferred or authorized by one entity to another.
-
B.
grantedTo
Indicates that a right, permission, or resource has been formally given or assigned by one party to another.
-
C.
grantedIn
Indicates that something (such as a right, status, or permission) is formally conferred or authorized within a particular context, document, or jurisdiction.
-
D.
authorityGranted
Indicates that one entity has formally given another entity the power, rights, or permission to act or make decisions, typically within a defined scope or context.
-
E.
grantedWith
Indicates that one entity is given, conferred, or endowed together with another entity as part of the same granting event or condition.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c0082c96988190b3a6a201edce472a |
completed | March 22, 2026, 3:18 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c02456efb48190bf3aaabcc77cda92 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 5:18 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69c021c2d8bc8190b947c7d1f423d2f3 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 5:07 p.m. |
Created at: March 22, 2026, 3:45 p.m.