Triple

T569773
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject United States bankruptcy courts E13635 entity
Predicate hearsCasesUnder P16126 FINISHED
Object Chapter 7 bankruptcy LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Chapter 7 bankruptcy | Statement: [United States bankruptcy courts, hearsCasesUnder, Chapter 7 bankruptcy]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hearsCasesUnder
Context triple: [United States bankruptcy courts, hearsCasesUnder, Chapter 7 bankruptcy]
  • A. cannotHearCasesFrom
    Indicates that one entity lacks the authority or ability to hear, consider, or adjudicate cases originating from another entity.
  • B. hearsAppealsBy
    Indicates that one party has the authority or role to review and decide on appeals submitted by another party.
  • C. hasJurisdictionOver
    Indicates that one authority or governing body holds legal power or control to make and enforce decisions over another entity, area, or matter.
  • D. hasAppellateJurisdictionIn
    Indicates that one legal authority has the power to review and decide appeals arising from cases within a specified court, region, or jurisdiction.
  • E. hasLowerCourt
    Indicates that one court functions as a subordinate or inferior court within the judicial hierarchy of another court.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a4933fa4d88190a7949cc83c08c5c1 completed March 1, 2026, 7:27 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a49b057e708190b4e5975516e58993 completed March 1, 2026, 8:01 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a494c2caac819086ab316fa49d324c completed March 1, 2026, 7:34 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69a498dd579081908e02368a4c5efc8c completed March 1, 2026, 7:51 p.m.
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:33 p.m.