Triple
T569311
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | the Absolute |
E13624
|
entity |
| Predicate | epistemicStatus |
P16121
|
FINISHED |
| Object | can be approached by reason |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: can be approached by reason | Statement: [the Absolute, epistemicStatus, can be approached by reason]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: epistemicStatus Context triple: [the Absolute, epistemicStatus, can be approached by reason]
-
A.
status
Indicates the current condition, state, or standing of an entity within a given context.
-
B.
uncertainty
Indicates that there is doubt, lack of sureness, or incomplete confidence about a fact, outcome, or state of affairs in the relationship or situation described.
-
C.
hasUncertainty
Indicates that the relationship or value is associated with some level or type of uncertainty rather than being fully definite or precise.
-
D.
canonicalStatus
Indicates the formal or official standing of an entity within an established authoritative or normative system.
-
E.
estimatedStrength
Indicates that a value represents an approximate or inferred level, magnitude, or intensity of something rather than a precisely measured strength.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a4933fa4d88190a7949cc83c08c5c1 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 7:27 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a49b0406d481908af5fc7bc67103fb |
completed | March 1, 2026, 8:01 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a494c2caac819086ab316fa49d324c |
completed | March 1, 2026, 7:34 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69a498dd579081908e02368a4c5efc8c |
completed | March 1, 2026, 7:51 p.m. |
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:33 p.m.