Triple

T5692838
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Dylan Moreland E125465 entity
Predicate relationshipStatusWithHelenaPeabody P65989 FINISHED
Object on-again off-again romantic relationship LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: on-again off-again romantic relationship | Statement: [Dylan Moreland, relationshipStatusWithHelenaPeabody, on-again off-again romantic relationship]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: relationshipStatusWithHelenaPeabody
Context triple: [Dylan Moreland, relationshipStatusWithHelenaPeabody, on-again off-again romantic relationship]
  • A. relationshipToHannah
    Indicates the specific type of relationship or connection that an entity has to Hannah.
  • B. relationshipToSaintBarbara
    Indicates that one entity has a specified relationship or connection to Saint Barbara.
  • C. relationshipStatusWithPaulMontague
    Indicates the nature or state of an entity’s personal relationship with Paul Montague.
  • D. relationshipToState
    Indicates a relationship or connection that an entity has with a particular state or governmental body.
  • E. relationshipToLaurie
    Indicates the specific type of relationship or connection that an entity has to Laurie.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69c0082bb19c8190823a4facd3cba79b completed March 22, 2026, 3:18 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69c029014588819094a2a0f6f9b66bab completed March 22, 2026, 5:38 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69c021c0e0408190ab6c3cd3f907e80f completed March 22, 2026, 5:07 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69c028fec2bc819083f5dca6a8d9d435 completed March 22, 2026, 5:38 p.m.
Created at: March 22, 2026, 3:44 p.m.