Triple

T5689889
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Gulf of Tonkin Resolution E125401 entity
Predicate laterCriticizedFor P805 FINISHED
Object expansion of presidential war powers LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: expansion of presidential war powers | Statement: [Gulf of Tonkin Resolution, laterCriticizedFor, expansion of presidential war powers]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: laterCriticizedFor
Context triple: [Gulf of Tonkin Resolution, laterCriticizedFor, expansion of presidential war powers]
  • A. criticizedFor chosen
    Indicates that one entity expresses disapproval or negative judgment of another entity specifically because of a particular action, quality, or outcome.
  • B. sometimesCriticizedFor
    Indicates that an entity is on occasion the target of criticism for a particular reason, behavior, or attribute.
  • C. hasCriticism
    Indicates that one entity expresses disapproval, objection, or negative evaluation directed toward another entity.
  • D. isNotedByCriticsFor
    Indicates that something has been recognized and highlighted by critics specifically for a particular quality, feature, or aspect.
  • E. criticizedConstruct
    Indicates that one entity expressed disapproval or negative judgment about another entity’s constructed work, idea, or creation.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69c0082bb19c8190823a4facd3cba79b completed March 22, 2026, 3:18 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69c029014588819094a2a0f6f9b66bab completed March 22, 2026, 5:38 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69c021c0e0408190ab6c3cd3f907e80f completed March 22, 2026, 5:07 p.m.
Created at: March 22, 2026, 3:44 p.m.