Triple

T5682106
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Coast Guard Cross E125222 entity
Predicate conflictCondition P65748 FINISHED
Object not involving actual conflict with an enemy LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: not involving actual conflict with an enemy | Statement: [Coast Guard Cross, conflictCondition, not involving actual conflict with an enemy]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: conflictCondition
Context triple: [Coast Guard Cross, conflictCondition, not involving actual conflict with an enemy]
  • A. conflictRequirement
    Indicates that one requirement is incompatible with or prevents the fulfillment of another requirement.
  • B. conflictWith
    Indicates that two entities are in opposition or disagreement, such that their goals, actions, or states are incompatible or interfere with each other.
  • C. conflictResult
    Indicates the outcome or consequence that arises from a particular conflict between entities.
  • D. conflictedBetween
    Indicates being torn or uncertain between two or more options, positions, or commitments.
  • E. reportedConflict
    Indicates that one party has formally reported the existence of a conflict involving another party or situation.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69c0082a884c8190a79001bae658941f completed March 22, 2026, 3:18 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69c0248751bc8190b12aaa42d1ef17e3 completed March 22, 2026, 5:19 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69c021be59088190a81c880957f666ab completed March 22, 2026, 5:07 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69c024861bc88190a17782c1982fbb3e completed March 22, 2026, 5:19 p.m.
Created at: March 22, 2026, 3:44 p.m.