Triple

T5679950
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject black rhinoceros E125175 entity
Predicate hornComposition P65938 FINISHED
Object keratin LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: keratin | Statement: [black rhinoceros, hornComposition, keratin]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hornComposition
Context triple: [black rhinoceros, hornComposition, keratin]
  • A. coComposer
    Indicates a relationship where two or more entities jointly compose a musical or artistic work together.
  • B. musicComposer
    Indicates that one entity is the creator or writer of a piece of music associated with another entity.
  • C. partOfComposerOeuvre
    Indicates that a musical work belongs to and is included within the overall body of compositions created by a particular composer.
  • D. compositionChamber
    Indicates a relationship where a chamber or enclosed space is used as the setting or environment in which a composition (such as a musical, chemical, or artistic work) is created or formed.
  • E. musicContribution
    Indicates that an entity has contributed in some way to the creation, performance, or production of a musical work.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69c008295c808190acfe78915e7d656a completed March 22, 2026, 3:18 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69c025303860819093e51f176babed71 completed March 22, 2026, 5:21 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69c021bc3894819084f37d14ba4b2644 completed March 22, 2026, 5:07 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69c0252e18988190a8f3aa0684c12fb8 completed March 22, 2026, 5:21 p.m.
Created at: March 22, 2026, 3:44 p.m.