Triple
T5676688
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Lord Justice General |
E125102
|
entity |
| Predicate | supremeCourtOf |
P65925
|
FINISHED |
| Object | criminal jurisdiction of Scotland |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: criminal jurisdiction of Scotland | Statement: [Lord Justice General, supremeCourtOf, criminal jurisdiction of Scotland]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: supremeCourtOf Context triple: [Lord Justice General, supremeCourtOf, criminal jurisdiction of Scotland]
-
A.
highestCourtOf
Indicates that one entity is the supreme judicial authority or top-level court within the jurisdiction or legal system of another entity.
-
B.
supremeCourtService
Indicates that an entity serves or has served as a member (e.g., justice or judge) on a supreme court.
-
C.
chiefJustice
Indicates that one entity serves as the chief justice (the highest-ranking judicial officer) of another entity, such as a court or jurisdiction.
-
D.
officeHoldsInHighestCourtOf
Indicates that an entity holds an official position or role within the highest court of a specified jurisdiction.
-
E.
highestCourtOfAppealFor
Indicates that one entity serves as the ultimate judicial authority to which decisions from the other entity can be appealed.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c008295c808190acfe78915e7d656a |
completed | March 22, 2026, 3:18 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c025303860819093e51f176babed71 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 5:21 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69c021bc3894819084f37d14ba4b2644 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 5:07 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69c0252e18988190a8f3aa0684c12fb8 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 5:21 p.m. |
Created at: March 22, 2026, 3:43 p.m.