Triple
T5673361
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Islam in Egypt |
E125026
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasConflictIssue |
P61381
|
FINISHED |
| Object | debates over Sharia implementation |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: debates over Sharia implementation | Statement: [Islam in Egypt, hasConflictIssue, debates over Sharia implementation]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasConflictIssue Context triple: [Islam in Egypt, hasConflictIssue, debates over Sharia implementation]
-
A.
hasConflictStatus
Indicates that there exists a state of conflict or dispute associated with the relationship between the involved entities.
-
B.
hasOngoingConflict
Indicates that there is a current, unresolved state of opposition, dispute, or hostilities between the related entities.
-
C.
reportedConflict
Indicates that one party has formally reported the existence of a conflict involving another party or situation.
-
D.
hasRelatedConflict
chosen
Indicates that one entity is associated with another entity through a related or connected conflict, dispute, or incompatibility.
-
E.
conflictWith
Indicates that two entities are in opposition or disagreement, such that their goals, actions, or states are incompatible or interfere with each other.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c008295c808190acfe78915e7d656a |
completed | March 22, 2026, 3:18 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c025303860819093e51f176babed71 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 5:21 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69c021bc3894819084f37d14ba4b2644 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 5:07 p.m. |
Created at: March 22, 2026, 3:43 p.m.