Triple
T5665063
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Leader of the Opposition (Spain) |
E124838
|
entity |
| Predicate | isCodifiedInLaw |
P775
|
FINISHED |
| Object | no |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: no | Statement: [Leader of the Opposition (Spain), isCodifiedInLaw, no]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: isCodifiedInLaw Context triple: [Leader of the Opposition (Spain), isCodifiedInLaw, no]
-
A.
codifiedIn
chosen
Indicates that something is formally recorded, defined, or established within a specific document, code, or legal/institutional text.
-
B.
legalCodePromulgatedBy
Indicates that a specific legal code was formally issued or enacted by a particular authority or governing body.
-
C.
legalCodeRecordedIn
Indicates that a legal code is documented, registered, or officially stored within a particular record, system, or repository.
-
D.
containsLawOn
Indicates that one entity (such as a document, code, or regulation) includes or sets forth legal provisions concerning another entity or subject.
-
E.
legislatedUnder
Indicates that a law, regulation, or policy was created, enacted, or established according to the authority, framework, or provisions of a specific higher-level law or legal regime.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c00828906881908966f270b8f130cf |
completed | March 22, 2026, 3:18 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c0236d3f94819095111c41a323612d |
completed | March 22, 2026, 5:14 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69c021ba4ec481909db8cdbf0e907dd6 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 5:07 p.m. |
Created at: March 22, 2026, 3:43 p.m.