Triple

T5660234
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Jean-François de Galaup, comte de La Pérouse E124718 entity
Predicate expeditionEndStatus P65601 FINISHED
Object lost at sea LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: lost at sea | Statement: [Jean-François de Galaup, comte de La Pérouse, expeditionEndStatus, lost at sea]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: expeditionEndStatus
Context triple: [Jean-François de Galaup, comte de La Pérouse, expeditionEndStatus, lost at sea]
  • A. explorationStatus
    Indicates the current state or phase of an exploration process or activity between entities.
  • B. expeditionCommanderAtCompletion
    Indicates that a person held the role of commander of a specific expedition at the time the expedition was completed.
  • C. expeditionEndYear
    Indicates the calendar year in which an expedition or journey was completed or officially ended.
  • D. describesExpedition
    Indicates that one entity provides a detailed account or characterization of an expedition undertaken by another entity.
  • E. expeditionMemberOf
    Indicates that an entity participates as a member in a specific expedition.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69c0082774a481909d7e63fb2aad56ac completed March 22, 2026, 3:17 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69c0236d3f94819095111c41a323612d completed March 22, 2026, 5:14 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69c021ba4ec481909db8cdbf0e907dd6 completed March 22, 2026, 5:07 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69c0236af5308190b3d698eadf7bcd2b completed March 22, 2026, 5:14 p.m.
Created at: March 22, 2026, 3:42 p.m.