Triple

T565888
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Alfred Sauvy E13551 entity
Predicate alignmentConcept P16437 FINISHED
Object non-aligned countries LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: non-aligned countries | Statement: [Alfred Sauvy, alignmentConcept, non-aligned countries]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: alignmentConcept
Context triple: [Alfred Sauvy, alignmentConcept, non-aligned countries]
  • A. alignsWith
    Indicates that one entity is in agreement, harmony, or consistent correspondence with another in terms of position, direction, standard, or principle.
  • B. alignmentChange
    Indicates a change in the moral, ethical, or factional stance of an entity relative to its previous alignment.
  • C. reasonForAlignment
    Indicates the justification or cause that explains why one entity’s alignment, stance, or position corresponds to or matches another.
  • D. orientation
    Indicates the relative directional alignment or facing of one entity with respect to another or to a reference frame.
  • E. positionedAgainst
    Indicates that one entity is placed so that it directly faces or is set opposite to another entity, often in close or contacting alignment.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a4933edcf08190b35ecfd6014caee6 completed March 1, 2026, 7:27 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a49a74793481908fee3baff0b1d348 completed March 1, 2026, 7:58 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a494c183b081909304944aa3d0fe8f completed March 1, 2026, 7:34 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69a4985952a481908b918350ececf484 completed March 1, 2026, 7:49 p.m.
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:32 p.m.