Triple

T565700
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject flag of Portugal E13547 entity
Predicate coatOfArmsPosition P16258 FINISHED
Object over the boundary of the green and red fields LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: over the boundary of the green and red fields | Statement: [flag of Portugal, coatOfArmsPosition, over the boundary of the green and red fields]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: coatOfArmsPosition
Context triple: [flag of Portugal, coatOfArmsPosition, over the boundary of the green and red fields]
  • A. coatOfArms
    Indicates that one entity serves as the heraldic emblem or coat of arms representing another entity.
  • B. coatOfArmsFeatures
    Indicates that a coat of arms includes or displays specific symbols, colors, or design elements as part of its heraldic composition.
  • C. coatOfArmsMotto
    Indicates the phrase or motto that appears on or is officially associated with a particular coat of arms.
  • D. heraldicTradition
    Indicates a relationship where something belongs to, follows, or is characterized by a particular system or style of heraldic customs and practices.
  • E. cantonPosition
    Indicates the relative placement or arrangement of a canton within a larger geographic or administrative context.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a4933edcf08190b35ecfd6014caee6 completed March 1, 2026, 7:27 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a49a74793481908fee3baff0b1d348 completed March 1, 2026, 7:58 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a494c044648190a98589ab18935216 completed March 1, 2026, 7:34 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69a498ff0c0081908947376a38b10d72 completed March 1, 2026, 7:52 p.m.
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:32 p.m.