Triple

T563556
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Council of State (British India) E13504 entity
Predicate couldConsider P16233 FINISHED
Object legislation on all-India subjects LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: legislation on all-India subjects | Statement: [Council of State (British India), couldConsider, legislation on all-India subjects]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: couldConsider
Context triple: [Council of State (British India), couldConsider, legislation on all-India subjects]
  • A. considered
    Indicates that one entity regards, judges, or thinks about another entity in a particular way or context.
  • B. considersFactor
    Indicates that one entity takes another entity into account as a factor when forming a judgment, decision, or evaluation.
  • C. proposes
    Indicates that one entity formally suggests or puts forward an idea, plan, or course of action to another entity for consideration or approval.
  • D. canAlsoBe
    Indicates that something has an additional possible state, role, or classification beyond its primary one.
  • E. canBe
    Indicates that one entity has the potential, permission, or capability to become, perform as, or be classified as another entity.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a4933edcf08190b35ecfd6014caee6 completed March 1, 2026, 7:27 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a49a712bc48190ba298b3c76ab11cc completed March 1, 2026, 7:58 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a494c044648190a98589ab18935216 completed March 1, 2026, 7:34 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69a498ff0c0081908947376a38b10d72 completed March 1, 2026, 7:52 p.m.
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:32 p.m.