Triple
T5622460
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Regional council of Södermanland |
E147639
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasLegitimacy |
P39443
|
FINISHED |
| Object | popular vote in regional elections |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: popular vote in regional elections | Statement: [Regional council of Södermanland, hasLegitimacy, popular vote in regional elections]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasLegitimacy Context triple: [Regional council of Södermanland, hasLegitimacy, popular vote in regional elections]
-
A.
authorityLegitimacyBasis
chosen
Indicates the foundational source or justification that makes an authority’s power or right to rule recognized as valid or legitimate.
-
B.
legitimizedBy
Indicates that something gains legal, formal, or social validity as a result of the authority, action, or endorsement of another entity.
-
C.
hasLegalStatus
Indicates that an entity possesses a particular legal classification, recognition, or standing under law.
-
D.
hasLegalRight
Indicates that an entity possesses an officially recognized legal entitlement or permission to perform an action or hold a claim regarding another entity.
-
E.
hasLegalForceIn
Indicates that something (such as a law, regulation, or agreement) is legally valid, binding, and enforceable within a specified jurisdiction or context.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c00906f2a88190a992c66b13d606d4 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 3:21 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c022133eec819086acb04864dde5ee |
completed | March 22, 2026, 5:08 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69c01b1d4b108190846ce586dc783acf |
completed | March 22, 2026, 4:38 p.m. |
Created at: March 22, 2026, 3:40 p.m.